Bitfarms Reaches Settlement with Riot, Restructures Board of Directors

After months of disputes, Bitcoin miners Bitfarms and
Riot Platforms have resolved their differences, leading to changes in the Board of Directors of the former. In the settlement, announced on September 23, Andrés Finkielsztain
has stepped down from Bitfarms’ board.

Board Restructuring

Finkielsztain’s departure paves the way for the
appointment of Amy Freedman, who will reportedly join both the Governance and Nominating
Committee and the Compensation Committee. According to the company, this move reflects Bitfarms’ strategy
to refresh its leadership team with diverse perspectives and expertise.

Additionally, the settlement includes an agreement
that prohibits Riot from taking further hostile actions against Bitfarms until
the 2026 annual meeting. This arrangement means Riot, which holds a significant
stake in Bitfarms, will not increase its ownership above a specified threshold
or propose additional board changes in the interim.

Speaking about the agreement, Ben Gagnon, the Chief
Executive Officer of Bitfarms, said: “We are pleased to reach this
agreement with Riot and look forward to turning our full attention to executing
our growth strategy. We remain focused on diversifying the business beyond
Bitcoin mining into exciting and synergistic new areas like energy generation,
energy trading, heat recycling, and other high-value revenue streams like
HPC/AI.”

Bitfarms Eyes Growth Strategy

In the upcoming special shareholder meeting, Bitfarms
will reportedly propose expanding its board from five to six members. Shareholders will
also vote on the nomination of an independent director to fill this newly
created position.

Bitfarms also expressed confidence in the agreement’s
potential to enhance strategic oversight. He acknowledged Finkielsztain’s
contributions during his tenure and welcomed Freedman’s experience in public
company advisement.

Early this month, Bitfarms rejected Riot’s claims about a hostile takeover attempt. The former accused the latter of trying to undermine the company for its own gain. Amid the escalating conflict between the two mining giants, Bitfarms issued a public statement to address Riot’s “misleading claims.”

The matter involved a dispute that arose when Riot
attempted to acquire Bitfarms at what the latter described as a discounted
price. Bitfarms mentioned that the offer only served Riot’s interests. Besides that, Bitfarms mentioned that Riot had refused to engage in meaningful negotiations and had not signed a non-disclosure agreement or provided a counter-proposal.

This article was written by Jared Kirui at www.financemagnates.com.